Nigeria’s political scene has been thrown into sharp focus following the Rivers State House of Assembly’s notice of impeachment against Governor Siminalayi Fubara, a development that has drawn widespread attention to the conduct of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike.
Observers have noted that the Assembly, largely populated by known allies of Wike, has acted swiftly in initiating the impeachment process, prompting concerns that personal political interests may be influencing governance.
Analysts argue that the impeachment notice, while a constitutional instrument, risks being perceived as a tool for settling political scores rather than a genuine exercise of legislative oversight.
For weeks, Wike, a former governor of Rivers State and a senior minister in the federal cabinet, has publicly criticised Governor Fubara, employing language described by political commentators as demeaning and confrontational.
Critics have raised concerns that the former governor’s aggressive posture toward a sitting governor, and by extension the state legislature, undermines institutional respect and the principles of mature political leadership.
Political analyst Dr. Chijioke Okeke said, “When a senior federal minister launches a public campaign against a sitting governor, it is no longer just a state matter. It casts a shadow over the credibility of the federal administration. Such actions risk portraying the Presidency as unable to enforce discipline among its appointees.”
READ ALSO: Rivers Assembly alleges Fubara breached presidential peace deals
The situation is further complicated by the alignment of Governor Fubara with the All Progressives Congress (APC), the ruling party at both state and federal levels. Yet the Assembly’s actions suggest partisan loyalty to an individual—rather than to institutional procedures—may be guiding legislative decisions, raising questions about the independence of governance structures.
Professor Amina Yusuf, an expert in constitutional law, explained: “Impeachment is meant to address gross misconduct or constitutional breaches, not personal rivalries. Using it as a political weapon erodes public confidence and sets a dangerous precedent for democracy.”
Observers also note that Wike’s conduct, which reportedly includes verbal attacks on other political leaders, has broader implications for the federal government.
Analysts argue that President Bola Tinubu, whose administration campaigned on competence, institutional respect, and order, now faces pressure to clarify his position and enforce standards of decorum among his ministers. Silence or inaction, experts warn, could be interpreted as tacit approval of confrontational political tactics.
Commenting on the wider implications, political commentator Emeka Nwosu said, “The Presidency must act to ensure that one individual’s ambition or ego does not overshadow governance. The credibility of federal institutions depends on consistent application of rules, not tolerance of excesses by powerful figures.”
The ongoing developments in Rivers State have turned the spotlight on federal oversight, ministerial accountability, and the interplay of personal influence with constitutional authority.
Analysts agree that the outcome of this political contest will have ramifications not only for the state but for the perceived authority and moral leadership of the Tinubu administration.