News
INEC explains objection to election materials’ admissibility at tribunal
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Friday in Abuja, explained why it kicked against its own documents tendered by the Labour Party and its presidential candidate in the February 25, 2023 election before the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).
LP and Obi had sought to tender the documents as exhibits to establish their petition against the conduct of the presidential election, which returned President Bola Tinubu.
It would be recalled that INEC, had on Thursday, through its counsel, Mr Kemi Pinhero (SAN), objected to the admission of several documents brought to the PEPC by the petitioners for the purpose of tendering them as exhibits in support of their petition.
INEC, at Friday’s proceedings, also objected to all the certified true copies of the Form EC8A the petitioners sought to tender from local governments across six states.
READ ALSO: Tinubu, APC, INEC oppose Atiku’s documented evidence at presidential election tribunal
INEC’s counsel, Pinhero informed the court that the electoral body kicked against the tendering of certified true copies of the documents, mainly election result sheets, on the grounds that they were strange to the petition.
Pinhero further explained that issues were not joined in the local government areas where the result sheets were sought to be tendered, adding that it was wrong for the petitioners to go beyond the areas where the election was disputed.
He further stated that the local government areas unlawfully smuggled into proceedings of the court are totally strange to the petition and cannot stand in the face of the law.
However, the Chairman of the Court, Justice Haruna Tsammani, held that it was wrong for INEC’S lawyer to attempt to give reasons for his objection now when all parties had agreed during the pre-hearing stage to give reasons at the address stage.
Responding, Pinhero said that he was compelled to offer some explanation following the bashing the commission received in the media that it was objecting to the admittance of its own documents in court.
The court, meanwhile, has admitted as exhibits, Forms EC8A from 21 local government areas of Adamawa, Lagos states, eight local government areas of Bayelsa and parts of Rivers and Niger as tendered by the petitioners.