Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate, has sharply criticized the administration of President Bola Tinubu for its approach to removing subsidies, particularly on fuel.
Obi expressed concerns that the government might extend this trend to other essential sectors, even suggesting that air could be the next target for subsidy removal.
In an interview with News Central TV, which aired on Wednesday, Obi questioned the transparency and intentions behind the government’s subsidy removal reforms.
“I’ve said it before, we have to show what is being removed and where it is being applied. You don’t know what the subsidy is today. You don’t know,” Obi remarked, pointing out the lack of clarity in how the removed funds are being utilized.
Obi’s critique extended to the broader implications of the government’s actions. He noted that the removal of subsidies has already impacted the cost of living for Nigerians, with fuel prices skyrocketing since the subsidy on petrol was removed in May 2023.
Obi warned that the government might not stop at fuel and electricity subsidies, hinting that essential services like air might be next. “If they had the chance, they would charge us for air,” he said, underscoring his skepticism about the government’s priorities.
READ ALSO: Obi laments loss of lives in accident at market in Abagana
The removal of fuel subsidies has led to widespread public discontent, as it has significantly increased the cost of petrol across the country, affecting transportation, goods, and services.
While the government argues that the removal is necessary to redirect funds towards infrastructure and social services, critics like Obi are demanding greater transparency and accountability.
He emphasized that Nigerians deserve to know where the savings from subsidy removal are being allocated, particularly in a time of economic hardship.
Obi’s comments reflect a growing concern among opposition figures and the general public about the government’s handling of economic reforms.
As the Tinubu administration continues to navigate the fallout from its subsidy removal policies, the demand for transparency and a clearer explanation of the benefits to the populace is likely to intensify.