The Transparency International UK has marked down two London houses suspected to belong to Senate President Bukola Saraki for investigation under Britain’s new law, Unexplained Wealth Orders, which became effective from January 31.
The global watchdog revealed that Land Registry documents show that the houses at 7 and
8 Whittaker Street, Belgravia, London are owned by Landfield International Developments Limited and Renocon Property Development Limited.
Based on current market estimates by Zoopla, the properties are worth a combined total of around £15 million.
According to data released in the globe rocking Panama Papers investigative stories in 2016 by ICIJ, these companies were controlled by Toyin Saraki, the wife of the President of the Nigerian Senate, Bukola Saraki, as well as one of his personal aides.
At the time of these revelations, none of these offshore holdings were reported in Mr. Saraki’s official asset declarations.
Previous public disclosures by Saraki have indicated he has high levels of unexplained wealth, Transparency International said.
In 2003, his asset declaration showed he had amassed tens of millions of pounds worth of assets during his time as director of Société Générale Bank and Special Assistant to the President on Budget.
The explanation he provided for these acquisitions was stated simply as “business”.
The No 3 is involved in an ongoing court case around allegations of false asset declarations from his tenure as Governor of Kwara state.
Other assets listed for probe by Transparency International include a £18m property at Kenwood Gate, Hampstead, owned by the First Family of Azerbaijan, Flats 138A and 138B at
4 Whitehall Court, London, linked with Igor Shuvalov, Russian First Deputy Prime Minister. The flats are valued at £11.4million.
There are also a £1m property in Guildford linked with Ahmed Mahmoud Azwai, former Libyan Major General and two apartments at Park Lane, said to be owned by former Pakistani prime minister, Nawaz Sharif.
Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs) are a new investigative power designed to help law enforcement act on corrupt assets.
The Orders, Transparency said, are particularly useful where there is no realistic prospect of cooperation or conviction in the country of origin, but there are sufficient grounds for suspicion that an asset has been acquired with the proceeds of corruption.
After an application from an enforcement authority[1], a high court judge can give notice of a UWO only if she is satisfied that the respondent is likely to be the owner of suspicious wealth beyond his means, and if all of the following tests are met:
- The respondent is a Politically Exposed Person[2] (PEP) outside of the EEA; or there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the respondent is or has been involved in serious crime
- The respondent’s known income is insufficient to obtain the asset
- The value of the asset is greater than £50,000
The UWO requires the respondent to explain how he lawfully acquired his assets. If he fails to respond or gives an inadequate response then this extra information can be used in a separate civil recovery process (an existing measure under the Proceeds of Crime Act) if law enforcement has gathered sufficient evidence.
The U.K. estimates that around £90 billion ($127 billion, 102 billion euros) of illegal funds are laundered through Britain every year and this includes money stolen from the Nigerian treasury.
Now officials will use the new Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs), which came into effect this week, to seize suspicious assets and hold them until they have been properly accounted for, Ben Wallace, Security and Economic Crime Minister told The Times newspaper on Saturday.
On the home front, Saraki will begin another round of legal tussle on his undeclared assets at the Code of Conduct Tribunal in Feb, 6m afyet the federal government appealed the tribunal’s acquittal of Saraki.