As the Nigerian government prepares to arraign 76 protesters affiliated with the EndBadGovernanceInNigeria movement on November 1, 2024, significant uncertainty looms over the case. Among those scheduled for arraignment, 66 are minors, raising concerns among legal experts and human rights advocates.
The protesters were initially detained following a series of demonstrations held from August 1 to August 10, 2024, where they expressed their dissatisfaction with the country’s governance.
During these protests, demonstrators barricaded roads and major streets across various states, calling for accountability and improved governance.
The upcoming arraignment will take place before Justice Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja. This event follows a prior arraignment in September, where 10 protesters faced charges of attempting to overthrow President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
The charges were linked to allegations of treason stemming from the nationwide protests, during which the government accused them of “levying war against Nigeria.”
As of now, the 76 remaining protesters have been detained for approximately 80 days without formal charges being filed against them. The prolonged detention has raised alarm among legal observers and activists, who argue that such treatment undermines the principles of justice and due process.
Activist lawyer Deji Adeyanju commented on the situation, emphasizing the grave implications of the upcoming arraignment.
“A reminder that the END BAD GOVERNANCE protesters who have spent about 80 days in custody without charge will be arraigned tomorrow at Federal High Court 10 Abuja by 9 AM. They are mostly minors,” he stated.
Adeyanju’s remarks highlight the legal and ethical concerns surrounding the treatment of minors in the justice system, particularly in politically charged cases.
READ ALSO: HURIWA condemns FG’s arraignment of #EndBadGovernance protesters, says its persecution
Dr. Amina Yusuf, a political analyst and human rights advocate, expressed her concerns regarding the government’s handling of the protests.
“The detention of these individuals, especially minors, raises significant questions about the respect for human rights and the rule of law in Nigeria. This situation reflects broader issues related to freedom of expression and assembly, which are essential in a democratic society.”
Furthermore, Professor Ibrahim Mohammed, a legal scholar, noted, “The lack of timely arraignment and clear charges against these protesters is troubling. It could be seen as an attempt to intimidate dissent and suppress legitimate expressions of discontent. The judiciary must ensure that due process is upheld, particularly when it involves young individuals.”
The EndBadGovernanceInNigeria movement has gained traction among Nigerians frustrated with the government’s perceived failure to address key issues such as corruption, unemployment, and inadequate public services.
The ongoing protests are emblematic of a larger struggle for accountability and democratic governance in the country.
As the November 1 arraignment approaches, observers are keenly watching how the court will respond to the situation, especially considering the involvement of minors. The outcome may have significant implications for the future of political dissent and civil liberties in Nigeria
The government’s decision to pursue legal action against these protesters continues to raise eyebrows, as many Nigerians question the motivations behind such a crackdown on peaceful demonstrations.
The situation serves as a critical reminder of the delicate balance between state authority and individual rights in a democracy.