MultiChoice Nigeria Limited has been fined N25 million by the Competition and Consumer Protection (CCPC) Tribunal in Abuja for breaking a restraining order.
A three-member tribunal panel led by Thomas Okosun ruled on Thursday that the corporation had violated the injunction given on March 30 and was therefore liable.
On Tuesday, the tribunal ordered MultiChoice to produce its audited 2021 financial report for violating a restraining order on tariff increase.
It also compelled the directors of MultiChoice to appear on September 8 with a certified true copy of a detailed financial report of the company’s 2021 financial year made by a three-member panel of the tribunal.
However, at the court session on Thursday, MultiChoice, through its counsel, Jamiu Agoro, informed the tribunal about two applications filed.
Agoro said after a proper review of the tribunal’s judgment, the company decided to proceed on appeal.
He said out of the two applications before the tribunal, “one is an application seeking stay of execution”.
The lawyer also noted that there was no management staff of the company available in Abuja to present the firm’s audit report.
“In view of our motion for stay of execution which has been served on all parties, we pray that you set the motion down for hearing for the tribunal to look at our application if it is meritorious or not,” he said.
READ ALSO: MultiChoice ordered to sub-license channels to rival
The tribunal, however, disagreed with Agoro, stating that the company’s appearance before it along with the audited report was the order of the day. The panel also stated that there was no notice of appeal before it.
“You know the law, counsel. First, those papers are not with us. The only reason we are here this morning is to make a pronouncement on the penalty the 1st defendant MultiChoice is to pay,” Thomas Okosun, chairman of the tribunal, said.
After a brief stand-down, the tribunal reconvened and awarded N25 million cost against the firm.
Festus Onifade, a legal practitioner, had sued the company on behalf of himself and the coalition of Nigerian consumers.
Onifade had prayed the tribunal for an order restraining the firm from hiking subscription fees for its services and other products on April 1, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice dated and filed on March 29.
The tribunal had granted an ex parte motion, directing parties to maintain “status quo antebellum” (to maintain the situation as it existed before).
READ ALSO: DStv, Gotv subscription prices: Why we dragged MultiChoice to tribunal– Lawyer
The tribunal also reiterated its order on April 11.
But MultiChoice implemented the tariff hike on April 1, claiming that it had already configured all its devices for the development.
The court upheld the contempt application initiated against the firm by Onifade and ordered that a detailed financial report of the company’s 2021 financial year be tendered to “enable the tribunal to determine the appropriate penalty to impose on MultiChoice for being in contempt of the orders of this honourable tribunal made on March 30.”
The main suit, however, was dismissed for lacking merit.