How 63 CSOs Situation Room report indicted INEC, military in 2019 elections

The Situation Room comprising of 63 Civil Society groups in Nigeria in itsreport on Tuesday on the 2019 general elections held in February and March 2019 indicted the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), political parties and the military in their conclusion that the general elections failed to meet the “threshold for a credible election” which was a specimen for their evaluation of the electoral process.

The Situation Room of 63 civil society groups which participated in monitoring the 2019 general elections, observed that the groups had issued a Threshold Document for a Credible Election “which stipulated minimum requirements for credible elections in 2019, drawing from local and international frameworks”.

The Situation Room, accordingly, listed some flaws which were identified to defy the credibility of the elections, raising “serious questions about the future of elections in the country and quality of democracy in Nigeria”.

The Report highlighted: “These standards were grouped under obligations to be fulfilled by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the political parties, the security agencies and other state institutions. “From the lapses noted during the observation of the 2019 general elections, it is the conclusion of the Situation Room that the elections failed to meet the threshold for a credible election.”

INEC compromise of the electoral process

The Report raised issues relating to INEC compromise of the electoral process where the commission was expected to play neutral roles.

“INEC operations fell short of its identified role and obligations in the Threshold Document. Logistical and operational challenges marred the credible conduct of the elections.

“The first sign of this flaw manifested with the shock and unexpected postponement of the elections in the early hours of the very day they were to begin, on Saturday, February 16, 2019.

“Postponing voting about six hours to the start of polls did more than expose how ill-prepared INEC was, it also dampened the nationwide enthusiasm that had built up for the elections.

“It made it impossible for many who had travelled earlier to vote in their constituencies to make a second trip, exacerbating voter apathy.

“The collation of results, another major weakness of Nigerian elections, remained a concern throughout the elections, with observers reporting interference with the process, especially by political parties and security agencies oftentimes with the active participation of INEC officials.

“Data in the voters’ register as well as results figures declared by INEC threw up several glaring discrepancies that have yet to be explained.

“There were also differences between the number of accredited voters and the total number of votes cast in many polling units. In a similar vein, the Situation Room identified discrepancies in the number of votes cast in the National Assembly election and the presidential elections, as it appeared that there was significantly more votes casts in the presidential elections than was cast in the National Assembly elections which took place simultaneously with the presidential election.

“A close scrutiny of the registration numbers given by INEC reveals discrepancies between the total number of registered voters before the election and the total number of registered voters announced by INEC during the collation in 30 of Nigeria’s 36 states,” the Report highlighted.

The Situation Room argued that the refusal of President Muhammadu Buhari to assent to the amended Electoral Act by the National Assembly for the flaws, noting that the flaws could have been avoided if the amended electoral act was signed “and put into use”.

The Report highlighted: “These include the situation whereby more than 70 per cent of people who voted in the last election, did so without full biometric verification. Absence of full biometric verification opens up the system to manipulation and proxy voting. The prevalence of this in states that returned very high number of votes in the election is particularly worrisome.”

Militarization of elections

The Situation Room berated the mass deployment of the military on election duty without being under INEC supervision or clear directive. They the Report noted culminated into voters intimidation, ballot box snatching and destruction, and general voter apathy as the national voter turnout rate dropped from 43.7 per cent in 2015 to just 35.6 per cent .

The Report highlighted: “Though not directly a responsibility of INEC, the inability of INEC to speak out in real time about these challenges and indiscriminate cancellation of election returns without clear explanation called into question INEC’s good faith.

“It is worth noting that since 2003, voter turnout has progressively decreased in each electoral cycle. This is a concern given the increase in the number of political parties to 91, the increase in voter registration (from 68,833,476 to 84,004,084), and rise in permanent voter card (PVC) collection rates (from 82.03% to 86.63%) between 2015 and 2019.”

It further noted: “The Situation Room observers noted military involvement in the elections outside of the limits allowed by law.

“The Electoral Act specifically states that military involvement in the elections shall only be at the request of INEC and only for the purpose of securing the distribution and delivery of election materials and protection of election officials.

“The Threshold Document called for a security deployment that was under the operational control of INEC in accordance with the provisions of the Electoral Act.”

The report also stated: “In apparent contravention of this, troops were deployed nationwide during the elections, without any clear coordination with INEC and with President Buhari warning that people who would attempt to snatch ballot boxes risked paying with their lives, a statement the army chief said he would heed.

“In places like Rivers State, the military posed significant challenges and obstructions to the performance of election duties by INEC officials. Situation Room received reports of incidents of partisan involvement in the elections by the military, particularly in Rivers state.”