Israel, Hezbollah reach 60-day ceasefire agreement amid tensions

In a significant development, Israel and Hezbollah, the powerful militant group based in Lebanon, have agreed to a 60-day ceasefire, marking a potential turning point in the ongoing conflict between the two sides.

The deal, brokered with international mediation, has been hailed by negotiators as a foundation for a more lasting truce, though the situation remains fragile.

US President Joe Biden, who played a pivotal role in brokering the agreement, expressed optimism, stating that the deal could pave the way for a “permanent cessation of hostilities.”

Biden also reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to securing a ceasefire in Gaza, underscoring the broader regional effort to stabilize the Middle East amid escalating violence.

The ceasefire, which takes effect immediately, includes several key provisions aimed at de-escalating the situation along the Israel-Lebanon border.

Hezbollah fighters are expected to withdraw 40 kilometers from Israel’s northern border, a move seen as a significant concession by the militant group.

In return, Israeli ground forces will pull back from Lebanese territory, ensuring that neither side maintains a military presence in the other’s sovereign land during the 60-day period.

Despite the ceasefire agreement, Israel has urged caution, advising residents displaced by the fighting not to return to their homes in southern Lebanon for the time being.

Authorities in Israel have stressed that while the truce may ease tensions, security concerns remain, and the situation could change if either side violates the terms.

READ ALSO: U.S. declines compliance with ICC’s arrest warrant on Israel PM Netanyahu

The ceasefire comes after several months of intense fighting between Israel and Hezbollah forces, which significantly escalated in August. Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah rocket attacks exchanged in rapid succession, leading to numerous casualties and widespread damage. On Tuesday, Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon killed at least 25 people, further exacerbating tensions.

Hours before the ceasefire agreement, Israeli forces conducted a bombardment of Beirut’s southern border, launching 20 strikes in just two minutes.

Hezbollah responded by claiming to have launched drones towards Israel. The back-and-forth exchanges between the two parties have resulted in heavy civilian casualties and extensive destruction, especially in areas near the border.

The conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has been brewing for months. In August, Israeli forces launched pre-emptive airstrikes targeting Hezbollah missile sites in southern Lebanon, following intelligence reports suggesting Hezbollah was preparing to fire missiles into Israeli territory.

The Israeli airstrikes, which involved over 100 fighter jets, were aimed at neutralizing what Israel claimed were “thousands of rocket launcher barrels” stationed across multiple launch sites in Lebanon.

In retaliation, Hezbollah fired more than 320 rockets into northern Israel, marking the start of what the militant group called the “first phase” of its attack.

Hezbollah cited the assassination of a senior commander in Beirut by Israeli forces as the catalyst for its offensive, claiming the attack was an act of retribution.

READ ALSO: Tinubu demands end to Israeli aggression in Gaza, wants 2-state solution actualised

By mid-September, the situation had worsened, with reports emerging of explosions across Lebanon. Dozens of people were killed and thousands more injured after a series of pager explosions rocked the country.

Hezbollah has accused Israel of being responsible for the blasts, alleging the pagers, which are used by the group as a communication tool to evade Israeli surveillance, were deliberately targeted by Israeli operatives.

While the 60-day ceasefire is a welcome relief for civilians caught in the crossfire, the road to lasting peace remains uncertain. Experts warn that unless both sides are committed to further negotiations, the truce could be temporary, with the potential for further violence if hostilities resume after the ceasefire period expires.

Political analysts suggest that while the deal may offer a temporary pause in the conflict, the underlying issues between Israel and Hezbollah—rooted in territorial disputes, military escalation, and broader regional dynamics—are far from resolved.

The ongoing power struggles in Lebanon, compounded by Hezbollah’s role as a key political and military actor in the region, further complicate efforts to achieve a sustainable peace.

International stakeholders, including the United States, the United Nations, and various European powers, have expressed support for the ceasefire, hoping it will serve as a model for de-escalating broader tensions in the Middle East.

However, many remain cautious, stressing the importance of maintaining pressure on both Israel and Hezbollah to ensure that the terms of the ceasefire are respected and the violence does not resume.