Another APC Rep loses seat for daring to challenge Gbajabiamila 

A member of the House of Representative, representing Ehimembano/ihitte Uboma/Obowo Federal Constituency, Chief Chike Okafor of the All Progressives Congress, has lost his seat to Emeka Nwajiuba of the Accord Party following a court order.

Okafor, who was serving his first term in House, had few weeks ago declared his intention to vie for the position of the Speaker of the 9th House of Representatives.

The sacked lawmaker, who was the House Committee Chairman on Health Services, contended that justice and equity demand that the region be considered for the position since other regions have been duly compensated.

Meanwhile, Emeka Nwajiuba, in his acceptance speech, while commending INEC and the judiciary for retrieving his mandate, however, called on APC leadership to consider the South East in zoning the Speakership of the House of Reps to the Southeast.

He said the APC has made steady progress between 2015 and 2019 in the zone, adding that zoning such position to the South East would lead to national stability, inclusiveness and consolidation.

Meanwhile, the INEC has reiterated its commitment to neutrality in election disputes with a promise to provide all requested documents to parties concerned.

The Commission, however, advised senior lawyer to re-examine the manner of sending junior lawyers to access sensitive election documents from it.

INEC National Commissioner and Chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee, Festus Okoye during the issuance a certificate of return to Nwajiuba said the Commission is committed to obeying court orders.

“On our own part, we are committed to giving all the political parties that are in election petition process whatever documents they want so long as we have those documents.

“We want to appeal to political parties, we want to appeal to lawyers engaged in election petition process to show leadership and show courage when dealing with issues around whether the Commission has obeyed a particular court order or whether the Commission has not obeyed a particular court order.

“We are committed to obeying all court orders whether those court orders are in favour of the Commission or against the Commission. It is now left for the judiciary to use their interpretative powers to adjust on matters,” he said.