A Dutch court has ruled that Bill Gates must stand trial in the Netherlands over allegations tied to COVID-19 vaccine injuries.
The case, filed by seven plaintiffs, centers around claims that Gates, along with former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and members of the Dutch government’s COVID-19 “Outbreak Management Team,” misled the public about vaccine safety.
The plaintiffs, who had received COVID-19 vaccines, allege that they were seriously harmed by the shots. One of the plaintiffs has since passed away, leaving six to continue the lawsuit.
The District Court of Leeuwarden ruled on October 16 that Gates and other defendants must face trial, despite Gates’ challenge to the court’s jurisdiction.
READ ALSO: Naomi Wolf’s “Pfizer Papers” exposes serious vaccines’ health risks
According to the Dutch outlet De Telegraaf, Gates, represented by the Pels Rijcken law firm, argued that as a U.S. resident, the Dutch court did not have jurisdiction over him.
However, the court found sufficient grounds to assert jurisdiction, noting that the claims against all defendants were interconnected, stemming from the same set of facts. Other defendants, including Pfizer’s Bourla, did not dispute the court’s authority.
The plaintiffs’ case, filed last year, claims Gates and others involved in pandemic management knowingly misrepresented the vaccines’ safety.
The case also references Gates’ role in international initiatives like the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Great Reset” and his foundation’s involvement in global vaccination programs through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
Plaintiffs’ attorney Arno van Kessel praised the ruling, emphasizing that the court acknowledged their claims. Despite legal challenges, Gates is now required to pay legal fees and face the next court hearing on November 27.
Legal experts remain cautious about the potential success of the lawsuit. Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst pointed out that COVID-19-related lawsuits have not generally been successful in the Netherlands, partly due to widespread judicial support for vaccination programs.
Nevertheless, independent journalist Erica Krikke, who has been covering the case, sees the ruling as significant, stating that even high-profile figures like Gates must answer to the court.
This case could potentially set a global precedent for plaintiffs suing high-profile individuals or organizations for vaccine-related injuries, especially when defendants reside outside the plaintiffs’ country.