Crime
Jang’s accomplice admits contradicting himself in court
In a trial-within-trial in which a second defendant, Yusuf Pam, a former cashier in the SSG office during former Gov Jonah Jang’s administration, has contradicted himself.
Under cross examination by the prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, Pam contradicted himself over claims that his statements were extracted under duress.
He and Jang are facing trial before Justice C. L. Dabup of Plateau State High Court, Jos, and the trial continued today April 26, 2022, according t the EFCC spokesman Wilson Uwujaren in a statement on Tuesday.
At the last sitting, Pam had told the court that between January 16, 2017 and May 2018 while in the custody of the EFCC, he was denied access to his phone, his lawyer, and his drugs. He further said that during interrogation, the Investigating Officer, Musa Sunday slapped and harassed him severally until he was compelled to write what Musa wanted to hear.
However, while cross-examining the defendant today, Jacobs recalled that the defendant, while being prosecuted before justice Daniel Longji, never mentioned that he was harassed or denied access to his lawyer or drugs.
He asked the defendant to look at exhibit TWT 12 and tell the court what he saw. The defendant confirmed to the court that the document showed he told Justice Longji he did not need a lawyer.
Asked by the prosecution counsel to check the document and tell the court where the EFCC denied him access to his drugs, the defendant replied that, “it was not captured”.
Regarding the claims that he was slapped by the IPO, Jacobs asked defendant whether he reported the purported incident to the EFCC’s Department of Internal Affairs or the then head of Economic
Justice Dabup adjourned the matter to April 27, 2022 for continuation of trial in the substantive matter, and gave the parties two days to write their written addresses for ruling on the trial within trial.
Jang and Pam were first arraigned in June 2018, on 17-count charges bordering on misappropriation of funds and criminal breach of trust. He was re-arraigned in February this year, following the reassignment of the case to Justice Dabup by the Chief Judge, Justice Yakubu Dakwak after the former trial judge, Justice Daniel Longji, on his last day on the bench (December 29, 2019), dismissed the defendants’ no-case-submission, and held have a case to answer.
-
Featured2 days agoBREAKING NEWS: Shouts of joy rock the world as Pastor Chris opens final Healing Streams edition for 2026
-
Business6 days agoNaira faces exchange rate gap as Dollar hits N1,380 on parallel market
-
Football3 days agoMan United shortlist Emery, Nagelsmann as potential replacements for Carrick
-
Business2 days agoHoodlums raid JED Benue office, abduct 10 staff over power dispute
-
Football3 days agoAston Villa ready to freeze out Garnacho to avoid £43m Chelsea transfer
-
Business3 days agoEV adoption: Roxettes seeks cheaper financing, local manufacturing incentives
-
Business1 week agoNCC launches Internet Governance Working Group to tackle AI risks, boost online safety
-
Latest2 days agoAkpabio tasks Tompolo-backed movement with spreading Tinubu’s renewed hope message


