Football
Solanke Vs Wilshere: one taken, other dropped
Can we please calm down with all the “but Jack’s played more football than Solanke, how can Southgate say he’s not picked him because he’s been on the bench” guff?
The players are in two very different situations. Wilshere is 25 and has plenty of experience at domestic and international level. In fact Southgate’s been very clear that the reason Wilshire’s not in the squad is not solely a lack of game time but that he has no time at all playing for Arsenal and Bournemouth in the position where Southgate sees him playing for England. If he isn’t going to play for England in these two games then what’s the point in him being there?
Solanke is 20 and has no experience of playing for the senior England team. Just being in the squad is an excellent learning experience for a player who lit up the U20 World Cup. He still gets something out of the call up even if he doesn’t get on the pitch.
In picking the players there is no conflict between applying different criteria based on the individuals concerned because Southgate isn’t choosing them for the same reasons.
-
Education5 days agoUniversity of Ibadan releases 2026/2027 post-UTME screening results
-
Football5 days agoUnpaid £185m Club World Cup fund sparks fresh FIFA controversy
-
Business1 week agoInformation Minister, VON DG to lead ARCON’s 2026 Advertising Industry Colloquium
-
Aviation7 days agoCanada issues 10 key tips to help immigration applicants avoid processing delays
-
Business1 week agoCooking gas dealers slash prices amid intensifying market competition
-
Politics1 week agoKenneth Okonkwo questions INEC’s credibility, calls for reforms ahead of 2027 polls
-
Business5 days agoBreaking: NNPCL reduces pump price of petrol as competition intensifies
-
Latest7 days agoFubara’s early push for political structure triggered rift – Wike