News
Chief of Army Staff challenges reuters to bring up evidence Over Alleged 10000 Abortions claim
The claim of abortion of 10,000 pregnancies, massacre of children and other Sexual and Gender Based Violations against the Nigerian Armed forces by the international news agency, Reuters has been challenged by the Chief of Army Staff.
The Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Farouk Yahaya challenged Reuters to bring up evidence to substante the allegations. He made this known on Saturday while testifying before the Special Independent Investigative Panel on Human Rights Violations in Counter Insurgency Operations in the North East held in Abuja.
The Army Chief accused Reuters of acting a script to rubbish the successes of the Nigerian Army in the North East.
His words: “some people are gifted in writing just like in novels, describing what they never witnessed forgetting that in the military if you waste any ammunition you will be court martialed. We are not a mercenary Army, we are a professional Army”.
According to the army Chief, “we are succeeding and not many are happy that we are succeeding, they cannot reverse our successes therefore they rubbish it. Sometimes, they are playing other peoples script. We are not Boko Haram terrorists, we are trained to be professionals and the training is continuous”, he added.
Speaking further, he said, “May be they don’t know we are operating under the government. The National Human Rights Commission follows what is being done in the military and what we are doing is internal operation; we are operating in our country. The Army is Nigerian Army and we are not like Boko Haram that does not operate under code of conduct”.
According to the erstwhile Commander 29 Task Force Brigade, Nigerian Army is majorly concerned about fighting the insurgency and restoring peace in the North East and therefore could not have abandoned this noble cause to engage in abortion of 10,000 pregnancies.
Asked by the panel’s secretary, Mr. Hilary Ogbonna to explain Reuters’ claim that that soldiers massacred many children perceived to have been fathered by Boko Haram, he retorted, “This is laughable because even if there is stigma attached to such children, is it the Army that will stop the stigma”?
He added “caution is planted in our head that the people you are fighting are Nigerians and there is no policy like that, rather the policy we have is respect for human beings, we are not more Nigerian than the people, that is why is Nigerian Army, the allegation is just grammar our business is to defeat the insurgents”, he stated.
Testifying further before the 7-Member panel chaired by Justice Abdu Aboki (rtd), the witness said while the military is buying arms to fight the insurgents one would have expected Reuters to support the efforts instead of adopting this “textbook solution” that does not reflect the reality of the situation in the North East.
-
Comments and Issues3 days agoCan President Tinubu Revive Nigeria’s Moribund Refineries?
-
Business4 days agoTinubu knocks Atiku’s subsidy plan, says proposal shows ‘ignorance’ of economy
-
Business3 days agoTikTok, ByteDance agree to $400m settlement in US children’s privacy case
-
Entertainment6 days agoPoco Lee faces rape allegation as unverified UK arrest report spreads online
-
Latest7 days agoTinubu files: US Judge grants four-day extension in FOIA disclosure battle
-
Featured7 days agoBeyond Osun 2026: What Adeleke’s re-election reveals about Nigeria’s road to 2027
-
Featured4 days agoEconomic Reality vs Party Machinery: What will drive Nigeria’s 2027 election?
-
Football4 days agoEPL 2026/27: Experts back Arsenal for title as Haaland, Rice lead individual award picks


