News
Germany rejects US Senator Rubio’s criticism of AfD extremist classification
We strongly reject the statements made by the U.S. Secretary of State,” said Foreign Office spokesman Sebastian Fischer on Monday, clarifying Rubio’s title was misstated. “I also reiterate that the insinuations contained therein have no basis in reality. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has the legitimate task of protecting democracy and the rule of law from extremists and enemies of the constitution.
The German cabinet has firmly dismissed criticism from U.S. Senator Marco Rubio regarding the German domestic intelligence agency’s decision to classify the opposition Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a right-wing extremist group.
Senator Rubio, in a statement made on Friday, labeled the move “tyranny in disguise,” arguing that granting the agency expanded powers to surveil a political opposition party was undemocratic and called for the German government to reverse its decision.
“We strongly reject the statements made by the U.S. Secretary of State,” said Foreign Office spokesman Sebastian Fischer on Monday, clarifying Rubio’s title was misstated. “I also reiterate that the insinuations contained therein have no basis in reality. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has the legitimate task of protecting democracy and the rule of law from extremists and enemies of the constitution.”
Foreign Office spokesman Sebastian Fischer, speaking on Monday, clarified that Rubio’s title was misstated and emphasized, “We strongly reject the statements made by the U.S. Senator Rubio. I also reiterate that the insinuations contained therein have no basis in reality. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has the legitimate task of protecting democracy and the rule of law from extremists and enemies of the constitution.”
Fischer underscored that the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, made the AfD designation independently and that its actions are subject to review by independent courts.
ALSO READ : UNFPA urges investment in midwifery to combat maternal, Newborn deaths in Nigeria
German Interior Ministry spokesman Lars Harmsen reiterated that the BfV’s decision-making process is classified and that the findings leading to the AfD designation cannot be publicly disclosed.
According to reports from Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the AfD has filed a lawsuit against the BfV in response to the May 2 designation.
The classification allows for broader surveillance of the party and is seen as a step towards a potential future ban.
AfD co-chairs Tino Chrupalla and Alice Weidel have strongly condemned the decision, describing it as a blow to democracy.
Notably, several recent polls have indicated that the AfD is currently ahead of the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU), the conservative bloc that won snap elections in February, highlighting the sensitive political context of this classification.
-
Business1 week agoDangote cuts petrol, diesel prices again to boost affordability, economic activity
-
Politics1 week agoAmuwo Odofin: Umeadi emerges winner of NDC Reps Primary
-
Featured1 week agoPSG edge Arsenal on penalties to retain Champions League crown
-
Health4 days agoSenate hearing set to review research on COVID-19 vaccines, cancer concerns
-
Crime3 days agoLASU student dies after armed robbery attack
-
Comments and Issues7 days agoWhy baby boys outnumber girls at birth
-
Football6 days agoFIFA confirms 10 key law changes for 2026 World Cup
-
Latest5 days agoCG Musa 4 PBAT’ group declares support for Tinubu’s 2027 ambition, cites strategic leadership

