News

NASS’s N1.4trn constituency project budget recipe for corruption – CACOL

Published

10 years ago

December 10, 2016

The Coalition Against Corrupt Leaders (CACOL) has chided the National Assembly over the proposal that 20 per cent of the 2017 budget be dedicated to constituency projects. Debo Adeniran, CACOL Executive Chairman protested that, “They are not just greedy, insensitive to the parlous state of the country.” He contended that, “If that proposal should come to fruition, we should then expect not just the aggravation of corruption; we should expect its conflagration.”

The CACOL boss condemned the report that the Senate made demand that 20 per cent of the 2017 budget should be allocated for constituency projects. He said” “it’s like adding salt to injury! What did they do with the 2016 budget? That is the first question to ask; 20 per cent represents a whooping sum of N1.4trn of the proposed budget of N7.2tn for 2017.”

“How could we afford to prioritize constituency projects which in most cases are just conduit pipes for corruption over more important issues including how to immediately get our country out of this gnashing economic recession? He queried.

“Our position had always been that there is no need for legislators to be taking funds for constituency projects because the whole idea and practice is susceptible to sharp practices. Some legislators go to the extent of contracting these projects to themselves directly or indirectly, that is if the projects get implemented at all.”

“Our position is that, the practice should be stopped, what is more logical is that the legislators should engage in NEEDS Assessment in their respective constituencies which will help in identifying and separating the real and felt-needs of their constituents. It is the outcome of these assessment that will inform government’s prioritization in its response to people’s needs.”

Continuing, Adeniran said “It is the outcome of these assessments that the legislature would pass to the Executive with a demand for the real needs of each constituent to be captured in the national budget. The legislature will also get a chance to cross-check whether the demands of their constituent were captured in the budget or not, when the Executive brings the Appropriation bill back to the NASS, and there would be opportunity to amend the bill.”

“Fortunately, it is the legislature that oversights all government projects and can always check the Executive at that level. We therefore emphatically condemn the proposal as we are convinced it would only aggravate and conflagrate corruption. Constituency projects only put the principle of ‘separation of powers in jeopardy, the oversight powers of the legislature is adequate enough, the whole practice should be abandoned! He concluded.