Covid-19

How COVID vaccines could compromise children’s natural immune system

Published

3 years ago

October 29, 2021

Spread The News

Experts have argued that the risks in giving the COVID vaccines to children clearly outweigh the benefits because of their natural immune system which could be altered by the vaccines.

Speaking against the endorsement of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for children between the ages of 5 to 11 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) advisory committee, Brian Dressen, Ph.D argued that Pfizer’s vaccine “failed any reasonable risk-benefit calculus in connection with children.”

Dressen, a chemist with an extensive background in researching and assessing the degree of efficacy in new technologies, told the FDA advisory that the decision to vaccinate children is being rushed based on incomplete data from underpowered trials, insufficient to predict rates of severe and long-lasting adverse reactions.

Dressen told the FDA how his wife was severely injured last November by a single dose of a COVID vaccine administered during a clinical trial.

“Because study protocol requires two doses, she was dropped from the trial, and her access to the study app deleted. Her reaction is not described in the recently released clinical trial report — 266 participants are described as having an adverse event leading to discontinuation, with 56 neurological reactions tallied.”

He said he and his wife have since met participants from other vaccination trials — including Pfizer’s trial for 12- to 15-year-olds — who suffered similar reactions and fate.

“Until we appropriately care for those already injured, acknowledge the full scope of injuries that are happening to adults, please do not give this to kids. You have a very clear responsibility to appropriately assess the risks and benefits to these vaccines. It is obvious that isn’t happening.

He said children should be considered fully vaccinated because they are well immune.

According to him, the virus uses the ACE 2 receptor to gain entry to the host cell, and the ACE 2 receptor has limited (less) expression and presence in the nasal epithelium in young children (potentially in upper respiratory airways).

“This partly explains why children are less likely to be infected in the first place, and less likely to spread the virus to other children or adults, or even get severely ill. The biological molecular apparatus is simply not there in the nasopharynx of children as reported in this JAMA study and this research letter.

“By bypassing this natural protection (limited nasal ACE 2 receptors in young children) and entering the shoulder deltoid via the vaccine, the vaccine’s messenger RNA and liquid nanoparticle content and the spike protein generated by the vaccine, could damage the endothelial lining of the blood vessels (vasculature) and cause severe allergic reactions.

He said pre-activated antiviral innate immunity in the upper airways of children work to control early SARS-CoV-2 infection, “resulting in a stronger early innate antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection than in adults.”

A team of Johns Hopkins researchers recently reported that when they looked at a group of about 48,000 children in the U.S. infected with the virus, they found no (zero) COVID deaths among the healthy kids.

Dr. Marty Makary indicated his team worked with the non-profit FAIR Health to analyze approximately 48,000 children under 18 diagnosed with COVID in health-insurance data from April to August 2020.

After studying comprehensive data on thousands of children, the team “found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition, such as leukemia.”

The study showed 158 of 232 (68%) of COVID cases occurred in unvaccinated individuals, and 156 of 225 (69%) occurred in fully vaccinated and symptomatic individuals.

The Wisconsin study suggests the current vaccines are not working with the predominant Delta variant, and there is no difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated (symptomatic) in becoming infected, colonizing, carrying and transmitting COVID. This is not a theoretical risk — this data provides a clear real risk example