Business
Stakeholders fault proposed tax imposition on vacant houses
Real estate stakeholders have faulted the proposed tax imposition on all vacant houses across Nigeria, saying the move would amount to double losses to house owners and would make life difficult for accommodation seeking residents.
Recall that a United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Adequate Housing, Leilana Farha advised the Nigerian Government to start taxing vacant houses in the country.
Farha, who was on a 10-day fact-finding visit to Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt and Kano lamented the housing crises in the country, explaining that most residents in Nigeria’s ballooning informal settlements live without access to even the most basic services.
Reacting to Farha’s advice to the Nigerian government, a Lagos-based estate surveyor and valuer, Stephen Jagun, said it was wrong to categorise all vacant houses as proceeds of corruption, adding that not all vacant houses were products of stealing as Farha might have claimed.
Jagun, who is the Principal Partner, Stephen Jagun and Associates, blamed underdeveloped mortgage system in the country for the vacant houses, saying this deprived accommodation seekers the opportunity to access the houses.
To correct the anomaly, he urged government to fix the economy, provide employment, while revisiting the nation’s mortgage system.
Jagun maintained that if government imposes taxes on vacant houses, the poor would suffer more as they would be made to pay more rents for accommodation.
He, however, noted that many people built the houses to store value while others built for investment purposes.
“Many owners of these houses did not borrow to build so they are not in a hurry to reduce rent. There is no obligation to pay loans,” he added.
Another professional estate surveyor, Richard Olodu, stated that taxing vacant properties would amount to double punishment for property developers who borrowed money to develop the property.
Olodu stressed that the imposition of tax could discourage people from investing in property which has wider implications for the economy.
“They have to pay both interest and capital to the bank without any income yet from the development. Taxes are payable on income. Why will you tax a property owner for being unable to secure tenants for his property, which is not his fault but due to economic downturn?”
-
Football1 week agoUEFA threatens FIFA World Cup boycott over proposed private investment plan
-
Education4 days agoUniversity of Ibadan releases 2026/2027 post-UTME screening results
-
Business6 days agoInformation Minister, VON DG to lead ARCON’s 2026 Advertising Industry Colloquium
-
Aviation5 days agoCanada issues 10 key tips to help immigration applicants avoid processing delays
-
Business7 days agoCooking gas dealers slash prices amid intensifying market competition
-
Football4 days agoUnpaid £185m Club World Cup fund sparks fresh FIFA controversy
-
Business3 days agoBreaking: NNPCL reduces pump price of petrol as competition intensifies
-
Energy1 week agoDangote Refinery offers fresh hope for Nigeria’s industrial transformation


