Just in: Tribunal declines ruling on APM’s petition against Shettima’s candidacy

The presidential election tribunal sitting at the court of appeal in Abuja, has declined ruling on the petition filed by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

The APM’s petition was premised on the eligibility of President Bola Tinubu and Vice-President Kashim Shettima to contest the February 25, 2023 election.

Haruna Tsammani, who read the judgment, said the tribunal lacks the jurisdiction to hear or determine an issue bordering on qualification or non-qualification of a candidate.

READ ALSO: Court rejects APC attempt to stop APM petition at Election Tribunal

Tsammani said the alleged double nomination claim made against Shettima has no substance, having been settled by the supreme court.

He said no one has the right to litigate on it again.

The tribunal said the issue of qualification or non-qualification is a pre-election matter that should have been ventilated at the federal high court within 14 days after the conduct of a primary election.

The tribunal also said APM lacks the locus standi to challenge the qualification of a candidate in another political party.

The tribunal said only an aspirant who took part in a primary election can challenge the outcome of such election.

READ ALSO: Appeal Court dismisses APM suit to disqualify Obi as LP candidate

The court referred to the judgment of the supreme court delivered on May 26 were the apex court dismissed an appeal filled by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

The APM in their petition submitted that Shettima was still a candidate as of 14 July when he was nominated as the vice-presidential candidate.

Tsammani held that there is evidence before the tribunal to prove that Shettima sent a letter to the Independent National Electoral (INEC) on July 6, resigning his position as Borno central senatorial candidate. And that his nomination as vice-president cannot be regarded as a double nomination.