The United Kingdom through the Chatham House, a British think-tank, has exposed that over $582 billion has been stolen from Nigeria since the country got independence in 1960.
It was gathered that the revelation was contained in an article, ‘Catch me if you can, African kleptocrats are finding it tougher to stash cash in the West. The days of brazen looting and laundering have passed,’ published in the latest edition of The Economist Magazine, online edition.
The article, which is an exposure of how African leaders loot their countries blind, highlighted: “LIGHT-FINGERED tyrants are looking back wistfully. In past decades they could stash their illicit wealth in the West. Friendly lawyers, banks and middlemen were on hand to park the loot. Sani Abacha, the military dictator who ran Nigeria in the 1990s, deposited billions of dollars in banks across the rich world, no questions asked. Western governments often seemed equally confused.”
The article noted: “Britain’s International Corruption Unit says its investigations have led to the confiscation of £76 million ($117m) in laundered loot since 2006. Another £791 million has been frozen worldwide, thanks to its work. Yet, that barely makes a dent in the £100 billion of illicit funds which Steve Goodrich at Transparency International, a watchdog, reckons enters Britain every year.
“Seizures are still the exception,” says Jason Sharman, an expert in international corruption at Cambridge University. “Dirty money still gets through most of the time.”
Giving a clue on the movement of the stolen money, the article says “The best way to hide and move stolen wealth is to set up a raft of anonymous shell companies and bank accounts. “Questionable payments linked to Mr. Sassou Nguesso’s son passed through Cyprus, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland, Global Witness, another watchdog, reported in August. The EU is trying to make this sort of thing harder by forcing member states to publish registers disclosing the beneficial owners of companies.”
What could address the problem, the article says is Britain’s ‘Unexplained Wealth Orders’, another innovation introduced that allow courts to order “politically exposed persons” to explain why their assets are so much larger than their salaries back home. The first was issued last year, it says.
African states also complain that little of what is recovered is ever sent back, the article says. “America, Britain and Switzerland have had some success. More than $1bn seized from Mr Abacha’s bank accounts has been returned. But many African states have not helped their cause, often because thieving politicians are still in charge.
“When Switzerland returned $500m of Mr Abacha’s money, most of it disappeared again. The World Bank has programmes to guard against such things, but some Western states remain wary, and rightly so.”
It states that tough laws will not work unless everyone imposes them. “If there is a gap, then the money-launderers will find it,” says Max Heywood, Transparency International’s global advocacy coordinator.
“Willing and effective implementation is vital. Some surprising places, such as Switzerland and Jersey, have grown more robust in this regard. But America leads the way. The Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative at the Department of Justice has seized stolen loot not just in America, but abroad. “
The US is aggressive in enforcement,” says Matthew Axelrod, a former DoJ official now at Linklaters, a law firm. “Penalties are very high and prosecutors are insulated from political interference.”
The article says Europe lags behind. Its law-enforcement agencies are often under-resourced. Investigators struggle when dirty money is held in several countries. Britain has spearheaded the International Anti-corruption Co-ordination Centre, created in 2017. Its head, Rupert Broad, says pooling intelligence has led to the arrest of five senior officials in four African states.
“The most important thing, campaigners say, is to take steps to stop dirty money arriving in the first place. Banks are becoming better at reporting dodgy deposits. Purveyors of luxury goods are less alert.
“Boat dealers in the Netherlands are supposed to flag suspicious purchases. But of 40,959 suspicious-activity reports to Dutch authorities in 2015, just three came from yacht-dealers, Transparency found.”